Time to get while the getting’s good
Freddie Mac continues to believe that mortgage lending is on track for a big year this year, but now expects the market to tap the brakes in 2017.
Last month, Freddie Mac’s monthly outlook report showed the government-sponsored enterprises’ analysts were continuing to project that mortgage originations will top $2 trillion this year, which would be the first time originations have been that high since 2012.
Freddie Mac’s latest report reiterates that belief, but now the GSE is expecting originations to fall back in 2017, from $2 trillion this year to $1.65 trillion next year.
But it won’t be purchase mortgage originations that will drag down 2017’s origination total, as purchase and home improvement mortgage activity is actually expected to rise next year.
According to the Freddie Mac report, next year’s drop will be driven by a significant decline in refinances.
Freddie Mac’s current forecast shows that the GSE expects to see $1 trillion in refinance mortgage originations in 2016, but projects that 2017 refinance volume will fall about 41% to just under $600 billion.
The reason for the decline? Interest rates, which Freddie Mac expects interest rates to rise slightly throughout next year, albeit not by much. And as Freddie Mac notes, refinance activity is “rate sensitive,” so any upward movement in rates will likely calm mortgage refinance activity.
“Even if worldwide bond yields recover to the pre-Brexit status quo, mortgage interest rates are likely to remain low for an extended period,” Freddie Mac notes. “Expect a gradual rise in rates throughout the remainder of 2016 and into 2017, with the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaging 3.9% in the fourth quarter of 2017.”
Freddie Mac’s report shows that the GSE’s analysts are not expecting much of an increase in total home sales going forward, with a slight decline in seasonally adjusted sales in the fourth quarter.
Freddie Mac projects that next year, new home sales will rise, driven by increases in new single-family housing construction that will push total home sales slightly higher, to 6.16 million in 2017 compared to 6.04 million in 2016.
Additionally, forecasting house prices will grow at a 5.6% annual rate in 2016, moderating to 4.7% in 2017, Freddie Mac’s report shows.
“The economy and labor markets are looking better. We’re even seeing modest wage gains,” Freddie Mac’s chief economist, Sean Becketti, said.
“And Fed watchers are increasingly predicting a December rate hike as things improve. However, worldwide economic growth is weak and its prospects have gotten worse. This may all sound familiar because we’ve been here before… last year,” Becketti said.
“As the economy sputters along a little bit faster than stall speed, the U.S. housing market continues to be a bright spot, though there’s less room to run than in the prior few years,” Becketti concluded. “Unlike new home sales, existing home sales have nearly recovered back to prerecession norms. Regardless, we see new home sales improving some next year driven by increases in new single-family housing construction which will push total home sales slightly higher.”
Much like that last glorious weekend at the beach before the humdrum schedule of school and work kicks in, August typically sees one last burst of home-buying activity before the busy summer real estate season comes to a close.
So it’s no surprise that with September around the corner, a preliminary analysis of our data here at realtor.com® shows that we’re having the hottest August in a decade—in real estate terms, that is. (It was pretty darn hot weather, too.) Homes for sale are moving off the market 2% more quickly than this time last year, and prices are hitting new record highs.
And continuing a winning streak that’s as amazing to us as those of Michael Phelps, Simone Biles, and Usain Bolt put together, Vallejo, CA, remains atop the hot list for the fourth month in a row. It’s followed by the bull markets in Dallas, Denver, and good old San Francisco.
“Realtor.com’s traffic growth has been particularly strong in August, even surpassing record highs set in July, making this an extended summer with unprecedented interest in buying,” our chief economist, Jonathan Smoke, said in a statement.
“With the school year starting now in most of the country, we’re seeing some drop-off in immediate buying interest,” he added. “The current conditions provide more opportunity for any frustrated buyers still in the market to face less competition as we close out the summer.”
Smoke and his team looked at the median number of days homes spent on the market to gauge the supply of homes for sale, and the number of listing views per market to arrive at a list of the 20 hottest real estate markets in the country—where homes are selling fast and there’s plenty of interest from buyers.
Not all the names on our hot list are familiar ones. New to this month’s list are Kennewick, WA, and Waco, TX. We’ve actually noted the surprising appeal of Waco before; Kennewick looks to be a charming inland town sitting on the bend of a river, equidistant from Portland and Seattle.
And Detroit was the biggest gainer, moving up four spots to crack the top 10. Check out the rest:
The hot list
|20 Hottest Markets
|San Francisco, CA
|San Diego, CA
||New to list
|Fort Wayne, IN
|Yuba City, CA
|San Jose, CA
|Colorado Springs, CO
|Santa Cruz, CA
||New to list
|Santa Rosa, CA
By Kenneth R. Harney Real EstateAugust 24
Could “smart-home” technology — features such as network-connected thermostats, security devices, appliances and lighting — help you sell your property faster and for more?
Probably so, according to recent consumer polling plus anecdotal reports from appraisers and realty agents. The key, though, is that the smart products need to be installed before you list your house, because most buyers don’t want to have to install them. They want things pretty much turnkey.
The latest in an ongoing series of research projects by Coldwell Banker Real Estate found that 71 percent of buyers in a sample of 1,250 American adults want a “move-in ready” house and that 57 percent of those buyers looking at older houses would consider them updated — and more appealing as move-in ready — if they have smart-home features already in place. Fifty-four percent say that if they had to choose between otherwise identical houses, one with smart technology, the other without, they’d buy the smart home. Sixty-one percent of millennials would favor smart-tech homes, as would 59 percent of parents with children living in the house.
A massive survey this year of nearly 22,000 home shoppers by John Burns Real Estate Consulting found that not only do prospective buyers rank smart technology high when they evaluate housing options, they’re also prepared to pay thousands of dollars for it. Sixty-five percent said they’d be willing to spend more for smart-home technology packages, and well over half would pay extra for interior and exterior security cameras, network-connected appliances, doorbells that send owners text alerts enabling them to check security cameras, smart air filtration vents and a variety of other high-tech items.
Appraisers are also acknowledging the value of smart-home technology and making what they call “adjustments” when they compare tech-enabled homes with similar but tech-deficient houses. “Absolutely,” Pat Turner, an appraiser in Richmond, Va., said in an interview. “Smart-home technology can definitely add to market value. If you have the data showing that houses with smart technology sell for more, then you’ve got to” acknowledge that fact in some way in the appraisal report, he said.
For example, if local builders show him that a house without significant smart technology sells for $200,000 but an otherwise similar higher-tech house sells for $206,000, this market data allows him to make dollar adjustments — up or down — on comparable houses.
Danny Hertzberg, a Coldwell Banker agent in Miami, says that from his perspective, “a majority” of active buyers in the market not only prefer smart home technology, “but they’re expecting it and asking for it.”
A few years ago, interest in home technology was confined primarily to the more-expensive segments of the market, Hertzberg said. “Now it’s at every price point, whether in the center city or in the suburbs,” new construction and renovations alike. Even in houses built in the 1920s and 1930s, sellers are incorporating smart-home packages into their renovations to appeal to today’s buyers. “It helps you stand out,” Hertzberg told me — it gives you an edge over competing properties — and it usually cuts the time needed to sell.
But here’s an issue that’s beginning to bubble up: Now that “smart home” has become a marketing buzzword, is it subject to the same sort of overuse and hyperbole as the term “green”? Precisely what constitutes a “smart home,” anyway? If you’ve got a Nest thermostat and some security gizmos, is that enough to make your place “smart”?
No way. This past spring, CNET, the online consumer technology news site, partnered with Coldwell Banker to develop an industry standard: A true smart home should be equipped with “network-connected products (via WiFi, Bluetooth or similar protocols) for controlling, automating and optimizing functions such as temperature, lighting, security, safety or entertainment, either remotely by a phone, tablet, computer or a separate system within the home itself.”
The baseline requirements: It’s got to have either a smart security feature that controls access or monitors the property, or a smart temperature feature. It should also have at least two features from this list: smart refrigerators/washers/dryers; smart TVs and streaming services; smart HVAC system, fans or vents; smart outdoor plant sensors and watering systems; smart fire/carbon monoxide detectors and night lights; smart security locks, alarm systems or cameras; smart thermostats.
Now you know.
Activists opposed to a $300 million makeover of the Redondo Beach waterfront filed a long-expected challenge to the project Monday.
Hours before a deadline, members of Rescue Our Waterfront submitted an appeal of the Harbor Commission’s Aug. 9 decision to approve CenterCal’s overhaul of 35 acres from Seaside Lagoon to the Redondo Beach pier.
The project — one of the most ambitious and contentious in city history — calls for the replacement of the deteriorating pier parking structure, a public market, a movie theater, a 120-room hotel, 20-foot-wide boardwalk, pedestrian drawbridge, retail shops, restaurants and creative office space, among other improvements.
COMMERCIAL OVER RECREATIONAL
The 439-page appeal filed by slow-growth activist Jim Light and other project opponents accuses the commission of failing to fully vet the EIR and outlines a host of alleged violations of state and city zoning laws, arguing CenterCal’s vision impedes coastal access by catering to the wealthy and putting commercial over recreational use.
The group is challenging the certification of the EIR because commissioners “did not adequately assess the impacts because they were more interested in keeping the process moving” and “stated their interest was to keep the process moving because they assumed it would be appealed to City Council anyway.”
View obstruction, the prioritization of parking for commercial use and “incomplete, inadequate and unsupported disclosure of physical baseline conditions” are among chief concerns with the EIR outlined in the appeal. It also challenges the selection of Mole B for a boat launch ramp, arguing paddlers and other groups will lose access to the water.
“There is no question that the project prioritizes the commercial elements of the project over long-standing coastal dependent recreational uses,” the appeal states. “These all represent violation of the California Coastal Act, the city’s Local Coastal Plan and the city’s zoning ordinances.”
Opponents Wayne Craig, Martin Holmes, Todd Loewenstein, Candace Nafissi, Nils Nehrenheim, and Eugene Solomon also are named as appellants, as are Light’s nonprofit Building a Better Redondo, Redondo Residents for Responsible Revitalization and Rescue Our Waterfront.
And though the appeal also lists the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 11 as an appellant, Light said that was an error in the paperwork. It should have referred to Unite Here Local 11, a hotel workers union that opposes the CenterCal project.
Earlier this year, Rescue Our Waterfront deployed another strategy to block the project: the group is gathering signatures for a ballot initiative that would further tighten development limits for the area set by voters with 2010’s Measure G.
In a statement, CenterCal CEO Fred Bruning acknowledged the long-anticipated appeal.
“We are pleased that there is so much interest in this project and that the council will have the opportunity to evaluate this much-needed revitalization — we always expected that this would be the next step in this process,” he said.
“Their review is the culmination of years of hard work from city leaders and the community to finally restore our waterfront and make it a place everyone can enjoy. We hope the council will reach the same conclusion that the Harbor Commission did: that this is an incredible opportunity to fulfill that vision.”
Note: This article has been updated to clarify that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 11 was mistakenly listed in the appeal.